Loan Deficiency in Cedar County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 121
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Cedar County, Missouri totaled $683,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Estella S Madden | Stockton, MO 65785 | $1,582 |
62 | William-wm Huseman T A Huseman | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $1,574 |
63 | Dennis K Whitesell | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $1,558 |
64 | Bonnie V Edde Rev Trust | Independence, MO 64055 | $1,415 |
65 | Charles Ray Burns | Stockton, MO 65785 | $1,359 |
66 | Robert Wayne Coulter | Stockton, MO 65785 | $1,320 |
67 | Kenneth Whitesell Jr | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $1,308 |
68 | Paul F Koca | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $1,287 |
69 | Wilma Heely | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $1,240 |
70 | Robert Carver | Stockton, MO 65785 | $1,123 |
71 | Alfred Marcum | Stockton, MO 65785 | $1,116 |
72 | Mike Wilson | Jerico Springs, MO 64756 | $1,098 |
73 | Pat Crane | Stockton, MO 65785 | $1,034 |
74 | Martha E Lukes | Nevada, MO 64772 | $979 |
75 | Doris Louise Fortney Living Trust | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $957 |
76 | Rene' Marchand | Switzerland, 00000 | $903 |
77 | Gary Whitesell | Stockton, MO 65785 | $860 |
78 | Mark Kent Beason | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $842 |
79 | Firstar Bank Trustee | Springfield, MO 65808 | $839 |
80 | Jerry T Cantlon Rev Trust | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $835 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”