Production Flexibility Program in Cedar County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 265
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Cedar County, Missouri totaled $1,431,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Robert F Couch | Springfield, MO 65803 | $5,015 |
82 | Estella S Madden | Stockton, MO 65785 | $4,968 |
83 | Duane Hubbard | Stockton, MO 65785 | $4,968 |
84 | Donald C Williams And Bonnie J Williams Rev Trust | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $4,829 |
85 | Dennis K Whitesell | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $4,818 |
86 | Ricky D Taylor | Stockton, MO 65785 | $4,794 |
87 | Ronald Coulter | Jerico Springs, MO 64756 | $4,686 |
88 | Joe Coulter | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $4,643 |
89 | Clark I Montgomery | Stockton, MO 65785 | $4,619 |
90 | Donald Berry | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $4,518 |
91 | Joe Berry | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $4,517 |
92 | Duane L Houk | Stockton, MO 65785 | $4,473 |
93 | Joe B Phillips | Stockton, MO 65785 | $4,423 |
94 | Frank Fox | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $4,262 |
95 | Jim Hendrich | Fair Play, MO 65649 | $4,133 |
96 | David Janes | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $4,110 |
97 | Dorothy Smith | Stockton, MO 65785 | $4,093 |
98 | J D Norman | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $4,042 |
99 | Lloyd Hoerning | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $3,870 |
100 | Betty K Moser | Oklahoma City, OK 73106 | $3,807 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”