Production Flexibility Program in Cedar County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 265
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Cedar County, Missouri totaled $1,431,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | David Dean Arnold | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $2,821 |
122 | Gary Whitesell | Stockton, MO 65785 | $2,761 |
123 | Arthur Julian Jr | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $2,713 |
124 | Mildred A Fox | Stockton, MO 65785 | $2,702 |
125 | James Lynch | Dunnegan, MO 65640 | $2,604 |
126 | Joe Lee Levi | Stockton, MO 65785 | $2,583 |
127 | Ricky Jackson | Belle Chasse, LA 70037 | $2,556 |
128 | Melanie Fugate | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $2,536 |
129 | Edna Leora Swaggerty | Stockton, MO 65785 | $2,534 |
130 | Martha E Lukes | Nevada, MO 64772 | $2,466 |
131 | Linda M Taylor Rev Trust | Stockton, MO 65785 | $2,446 |
132 | Kent Henry | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $2,439 |
133 | Lorene Fisher | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $2,420 |
134 | Dean Dawes | Stockton, MO 65785 | $2,419 |
135 | Orval Holman | Tustin, CA 92780 | $2,363 |
136 | Kenneth Witt | Arvada, CO 80005 | $2,334 |
137 | Bernadette Dayton Berning | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $2,170 |
138 | Sam Yokley | Stockton, MO 65785 | $2,164 |
139 | L Thomas Elliston | Carl Junction, MO 64834 | $2,157 |
140 | Alvin R Dody | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $2,089 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”