Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Cedar County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 35
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Cedar County, Missouri totaled $17,915 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Colton Whitesell | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $2,830 |
2 | Gary Joseph Koke | Stockton, MO 65785 | $1,650 |
3 | Sarah Jean Bock | Stockton, MO 65785 | $1,086 |
4 | Nedra Fox | Stockton, MO 65785 | $1,064 |
5 | Vera Whitesell | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $1,015 |
6 | Linda Burmester | Jerico Springs, MO 64756 | $866 |
7 | Irene Neill | Fair Play, MO 65649 | $833 |
8 | Gayle Davis | Stockton, MO 65785 | $718 |
9 | Lorene Fisher | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $677 |
10 | Estella S Madden | Stockton, MO 65785 | $627 |
11 | Linda Wagner | Stockton, MO 65785 | $536 |
12 | Jodi L Graves | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $501 |
13 | Elizabeth Claire Moreau | Stockton, MO 65785 | $479 |
14 | Jackie Boyles | Stockton, MO 65785 | $470 |
15 | Charlotte Haden | Stockton, MO 65785 | $462 |
16 | Roxene C Robison | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $429 |
17 | Nicholas Norval | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $380 |
18 | Rose Mary Clemons | Dunnegan, MO 65640 | $371 |
19 | Melva A Pellegrin | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $371 |
20 | Ramona York | Stockton, MO 65785 | $314 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>