Farm Subsidy information
Cedar County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Cedar County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 248
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cedar County, Missouri totaled $1,867,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chance Coulter | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $14,962 |
22 | Ted Anderson | Stockton, MO 65785 | $14,360 |
23 | Spinks Ranch LLC | Jerico Springs, MO 64756 | $13,530 |
24 | Wesley Raymond Scholes Rev Trust | Overland Park, KS 66223 | $13,213 |
25 | Robert Wayne Coulter | Stockton, MO 65785 | $12,786 |
26 | Max A Thomason | Stockton, MO 65785 | $12,697 |
27 | Jp & Cg Ag, LLC | Gordon, NE 69343 | $12,046 |
28 | Lola F Ehlers | Stockton, MO 65785 | $11,208 |
29 | Marjorie D Johnson Rev Trust | Stockton, MO 65785 | $10,847 |
30 | Stanley Ehlers | Stockton, MO 65785 | $9,217 |
31 | Rice Land & Cattle Co Inc | Lamar, MO 64759 | $9,061 |
32 | Roxene C Robison | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $8,804 |
33 | Dcu Properties LLC | Springfield, MO 65809 | $8,540 |
34 | Ace Whitesell | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $8,280 |
35 | Lester Earl Byler | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $7,970 |
36 | Mid Continent Equity Holdings Ll | Stockton, MO 65785 | $7,898 |
37 | Vera Whitesell | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $7,859 |
38 | Stefan A Wick | Stockton, MO 65785 | $7,477 |
39 | Eric Hackleman | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $7,282 |
40 | Darrel Byler | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $7,142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”