Counter Cyclical Program in Cedar County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 173
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cedar County, Missouri totaled $124,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jerry Taylor | Stockton, MO 65785 | $18,332 |
2 | Atra Data Inc | Lake Ozark, MO 65049 | $12,746 |
3 | Johnson Stock Farms LLC | Stockton, MO 65785 | $4,708 |
4 | Raymond Neill | Fair Play, MO 65649 | $2,895 |
5 | Eldon Steward | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $2,792 |
6 | Wesley R Scholes Rev Trust | Jerico Springs, MO 64756 | $2,522 |
7 | Olaf H Ehlers Rev Trust | Stockton, MO 65785 | $2,424 |
8 | Floyd Wosoba | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $2,308 |
9 | Ricky D Taylor | Stockton, MO 65785 | $2,281 |
10 | Thoreson Ranch Inc | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $2,058 |
11 | Vernon Len Burns | Stockton, MO 65785 | $1,866 |
12 | Lee Montgomery | Springfield, MO 65803 | $1,789 |
13 | Coale Family Trust | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $1,777 |
14 | David Whistance | Lees Summit, MO 64082 | $1,656 |
15 | Butts Farms LLC | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $1,646 |
16 | Alfred & Willhemina Hammons Rev Trust | Dunnegan, MO 65640 | $1,625 |
17 | Owen-good Ranch LLC | Belton, MO 64012 | $1,518 |
18 | Kenneth Whitesell Jr | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $1,492 |
19 | Stanley Ehlers | Stockton, MO 65785 | $1,488 |
20 | George Burns Jr | Jerico Springs, MO 64756 | $1,442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>