Production Flexibility Program in Cedar County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 265
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Cedar County, Missouri totaled $1,431,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Vernon Len Burns | Stockton, MO 65785 | $60,973 |
2 | Jerry Taylor | Stockton, MO 65785 | $40,784 |
3 | Johnson Stock Farms LLC | Stockton, MO 65785 | $32,506 |
4 | Wesley R Scholes Rev Trust | Jerico Springs, MO 64756 | $28,733 |
5 | Thoreson Ranch Inc | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $27,747 |
6 | Benny Bough | Stockton, MO 65785 | $27,142 |
7 | Lewis R Eslinger | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $26,922 |
8 | Kem Price | Lockwood, MO 65682 | $25,714 |
9 | Gilbert W Good | Belton, MO 64012 | $23,763 |
10 | Ferd W Good | Belton, MO 64012 | $23,763 |
11 | Kenneth Whitesell Jr | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $23,397 |
12 | John P Whitesell | Reno, NV 89509 | $22,270 |
13 | Floyd Wosoba | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $22,045 |
14 | Coale Family Trust | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $21,593 |
15 | Tri B Farms % Harry Beckley | Jerico Springs, MO 64756 | $21,558 |
16 | Don A Hall | Greenfield, MO 65661 | $21,108 |
17 | Teddy L Sell And Cleva B Sell Fam | Jerico Springs, MO 64756 | $20,761 |
18 | Hammons Products Co | Stockton, MO 65785 | $19,878 |
19 | Lincoln Robert Hughes | Nevada, MO 64772 | $19,638 |
20 | Sheila Eslinger Richards | Stockton, MO 65785 | $16,903 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>