Tobacco Loss Assistance Program in Chariton County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 135
Recipients of Tobacco Loss Assistance Program from farms in Chariton County, Missouri totaled $158,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Harley D Gebhardt | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $878 |
42 | Kevin Pegelow | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $865 |
43 | Robert W Magruder | Dalton, MO 65246 | $838 |
44 | Darren Linneman | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $810 |
45 | Anthony Joseph Westhues | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $760 |
46 | Ann I Parks | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $759 |
47 | Gene Meyer | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $727 |
48 | Wilbert H Meyer | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $703 |
49 | Robert L Schmidt Revocable Trust | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $686 |
50 | William A Schmidt Jr Revocable Trust | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $685 |
51 | Brand Brothers | Fayette, MO 65248 | $682 |
52 | Darwin Brewer | Rushville, IN 46173 | $627 |
53 | Vernelle Kramm | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $612 |
54 | Ronald G Mcneall And Carolyn M Mcneall Trust | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $608 |
55 | Dale Monnig | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $607 |
56 | Genevieve Monnig | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $548 |
57 | Wayne Mccollum | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $547 |
58 | Jean Z Pennington | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $537 |
59 | William E Linneman | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $529 |
60 | Scott Strodtman | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”