Conservation Reserve Program in Chariton County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 412
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Chariton County, Missouri totaled $2,328,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kent Dorvis Harmon | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $10,148 |
62 | James Cross | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $9,935 |
63 | Holderieath Farms LLC | Mendon, MO 64660 | $9,912 |
64 | Gayle Lynne King | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $9,800 |
65 | Deborah S Whitis | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $9,612 |
66 | , | $9,603 | |
67 | George Bussman | Marceline, MO 64658 | $9,463 |
68 | Ricky Alan Manson | Brunswick, MO 65236 | $9,435 |
69 | Billie Edward Lightfoot And Norma Lee Lightfoot Tr | Kansas City, MO 64118 | $9,385 |
70 | Matt Mcgowan | Marceline, MO 64658 | $9,330 |
71 | Meade Family Trust Dated May 20, 2015 | Mendon, MO 64660 | $9,122 |
72 | Linneman Farm Inc | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $8,894 |
73 | Donald W Cox | Ocala, FL 34470 | $8,706 |
74 | Joseph W Bange | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $8,672 |
75 | Roger Petersen | Higginsville, MO 64037 | $8,345 |
76 | Darrell Boss | Kansas City, MO 64156 | $8,203 |
77 | Scott Todd Stefankiewicz | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $8,126 |
78 | Ralph Niemeier | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $8,120 |
79 | Floyd M Rodgers | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $7,992 |
80 | Schupback Farms LLC | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $7,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”