Conservation Reserve Program in Chariton County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 416
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Chariton County, Missouri totaled $2,194,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gerald W Fletcher | Hale, MO 64643 | $7,535 |
82 | L & E Stephens Farms Inc | Triplett, MO 65286 | $7,445 |
83 | Cheryl A Rice Trust | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $7,382 |
84 | Cathy A Ackermann | Brunswick, MO 65236 | $7,041 |
85 | Julia Horner | Auxvasse, MO 65231 | $7,033 |
86 | Michael Gladbach | Mendon, MO 64660 | $6,812 |
87 | Kelly Jean Chasteen | Liberty, MO 64068 | $6,757 |
88 | Kurt Herman | Brunswick, MO 65236 | $6,748 |
89 | Pollard Land Trust | Rothville, MO 64676 | $6,718 |
90 | Martha B Ridgely | Macon, MO 63552 | $6,702 |
91 | D & J Farms Inc | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $6,692 |
92 | Maag Sales & Service Inc | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $6,673 |
93 | Charles H Bondy | Brunswick, MO 65236 | $6,561 |
94 | Carpenter Family Trust | Kansas City, MO 64157 | $6,551 |
95 | Steven D Brooks | Saint Joseph, MO 64507 | $6,509 |
96 | Pope Family Trust | Marceline, MO 64658 | $6,459 |
97 | Steven R Joannes | Lone Jack, MO 64070 | $6,411 |
98 | Terry Ponting | Sumner, MO 64681 | $6,392 |
99 | Billie Edward Lightfoot And Norma Lee Lightfoot Tr | Kansas City, MO 64118 | $6,388 |
100 | Carl Emmerich | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $6,384 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”