Deficiency Payment in Chariton County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 843
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Chariton County, Missouri totaled $1,498,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | William A Schmidt Sr Trust | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $4,641 |
82 | James W Andrews | Columbia, MO 65203 | $4,638 |
83 | Leonard Henderson & Hayes | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $4,591 |
84 | Gail Friesz | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $4,570 |
85 | Willard E Harmon Revocable Trust | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $4,481 |
86 | Mayme Linneman | Brunswick, MO 65236 | $4,467 |
87 | Leland Clark Linneman | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $4,466 |
88 | James M Robinson | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $4,449 |
89 | Hayes Livestock Inc | Marceline, MO 64658 | $4,410 |
90 | George J Hanke | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $4,285 |
91 | Willard C Sanders | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $4,280 |
92 | William Miner Stanley | Rothville, MO 64676 | $4,244 |
93 | Scheiderer Farms Inc | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $4,241 |
94 | Daryl Jacobs | Mendon, MO 64660 | $4,193 |
95 | Samuel Brand | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $4,113 |
96 | Ervin Windsor | Sumner, MO 64681 | $4,098 |
97 | Robert H Littleton | Dalton, MO 65246 | $4,096 |
98 | Clifford L Imgarten Rev Trust | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $4,037 |
99 | Edward Fitzgerald | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $4,021 |
100 | Harold A Edwards | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $3,968 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”