Conservation Reserve Program in Chariton County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 416
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Chariton County, Missouri totaled $2,194,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Adam L Barnett | Marceline, MO 64658 | $4,011 |
162 | Larry P Brooks | Lexington, MO 64067 | $3,989 |
163 | Paul Jackson | Moberly, MO 65270 | $3,976 |
164 | Corn Crib Farms Inc | Brunswick, MO 65236 | $3,937 |
165 | Abraham Jerrad Clark | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $3,926 |
166 | Shane Dell | Marceline, MO 64658 | $3,905 |
167 | Jerry Springer | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $3,887 |
168 | Cheryl Springer | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $3,887 |
169 | Klaus Farms | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $3,862 |
170 | Frank Lodder | Marceline, MO 64658 | $3,849 |
171 | Clyde A Pope And Jeanine M Pope Rev Living Trust | Marceline, MO 64658 | $3,846 |
172 | Jack Roger Moore Jr | Blue Springs, MO 64015 | $3,840 |
173 | Kenny Joseph Clark | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $3,829 |
174 | The William E Gann And Connie D Gann Revocable Liv | Brunswick, MO 65236 | $3,816 |
175 | Jeannie Komar | Moberly, MO 65270 | $3,797 |
176 | Havoc Flats LLC | Sumner, MO 64681 | $3,768 |
177 | George Michael Friesz | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $3,756 |
178 | Earl Atkinson Revocable Trust | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $3,747 |
179 | Joel Maurice Abeln | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $3,745 |
180 | Donald Meissen | New Cambria, MO 63558 | $3,728 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”