Production Flexibility Program in Chariton County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,683
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Chariton County, Missouri totaled $18,822,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mildred Z Heiman | Russellville, MO 65074 | $70,245 |
42 | Merlin Clark Farms Inc | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $69,797 |
43 | Eugene Foster Revocable Trust | Hale, MO 64643 | $69,598 |
44 | Kuhler Farms Inc | Columbia, MO 65202 | $69,410 |
45 | Kottman Farms Inc | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $69,276 |
46 | Triplett Prairie Farms Inc | Triplett, MO 65286 | $69,210 |
47 | Kent Dorvis Harmon | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $68,733 |
48 | Daniels Farms Inc | Mendon, MO 64660 | $68,500 |
49 | Carl Emmerich | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $67,525 |
50 | Darryl Lee Young | Mendon, MO 64660 | $66,186 |
51 | Harvey Linneman | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $64,464 |
52 | William Miner Stanley | Rothville, MO 64676 | $63,940 |
53 | David L Blunk | Brunswick, MO 65236 | $63,249 |
54 | Diamond M Farms Inc | Mendon, MO 64660 | $62,762 |
55 | George J Hanke | Keytesville, MO 65261 | $62,701 |
56 | James Edward Fitzgerald Jr | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $59,462 |
57 | Marie Knight Farms Inc | Estero, FL 33928 | $59,137 |
58 | Wilhoit Living Trust | Dalton, MO 65246 | $58,740 |
59 | Jeffrey R Watkins | Brookfield, MO 64628 | $58,528 |
60 | Scheiderer Farms Inc | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $58,495 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”