Conservation Reserve Program in Clark County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 273
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clark County, Missouri totaled $1,558,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Mitch Krueger | Palmyra, MO 63461 | $2,572 |
162 | Patricia- Carl Baker Rev Trust D Baker | Clearfield, UT 84015 | $2,500 |
163 | Norman- Norman Martin Trust 1 B Martin | Ovid, MI 48866 | $2,491 |
164 | Harold H Buschling Trust | Canton, MO 63435 | $2,421 |
165 | Sara E Lyles | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $2,408 |
166 | Rusty Hunziker | Williamstown, MO 63473 | $2,374 |
167 | Kent W Dobson | Keokuk, IA 52632 | $2,331 |
168 | Ed Dobson | Lake Ozark, MO 65049 | $2,331 |
169 | Wayne Junior Blum | Kahoka, MO 63445 | $2,295 |
170 | George M Eftink | Bonne Terre, MO 63628 | $2,291 |
171 | Abnhog 21 LLC | Kearney, MO 64060 | $2,262 |
172 | John Lee Saufley | Hummelstown, PA 17036 | $2,169 |
173 | John Samuel Wheeler- John And Erin Wheeler Trust | Williamstown, MO 63473 | $2,102 |
174 | Roger Walker | Williamstown, MO 63473 | $2,098 |
175 | Alan Hufford | Revere, MO 63465 | $2,070 |
176 | Brandon Wayne Winters | Kahoka, MO 63445 | $2,057 |
177 | Kenneth Sowers | Alexandria, MO 63430 | $2,036 |
178 | Wayne And Pam Wright Family Revocable Trust | Wayland, MO 63472 | $2,024 |
179 | Steven C Vossen | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $1,995 |
180 | Martin Joseph Hogan | Wyaconda, MO 63474 | $1,972 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”