Emergency Conservation Program in Cole County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 222
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Cole County, Missouri totaled $1,034,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
201 | Joseph B Huhn | Centertown, MO 65023 | $611 |
202 | Doug Stockman | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $593 |
203 | Robert Fischer | Columbia, MO 65201 | $560 |
204 | Natalie Young | Saint Louis, MO 63138 | $560 |
205 | David A Boessen | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $522 |
206 | Randy Hunziker | Centertown, MO 65023 | $498 |
207 | Bernard A Lage | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $480 |
208 | Leona Schoch | Russellville, MO 65074 | $469 |
209 | Ken Willingham | Russellville, MO 65074 | $459 |
210 | Hilbert Strobel | Centertown, MO 65023 | $455 |
211 | Frank Schwarzer | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $448 |
212 | Martha Mueller Rutledge Trust Agr | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $422 |
213 | Marty Masters | Eugene, MO 65032 | $409 |
214 | Allen Huhn | Centertown, MO 65023 | $384 |
215 | William L Blackburn | Russellville, MO 65074 | $366 |
216 | Herbert D Raithel | Russellville, MO 65074 | $329 |
217 | Zachary Wolken | Russellville, MO 65074 | $265 |
218 | Mark Knernschield | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $257 |
219 | Karen Sue Prenger | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $257 |
220 | Richard A Michael Trust A | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $189 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”