Market Loss Assistance Program in Cole County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 426
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Cole County, Missouri totaled $1,482,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Charles Bruemmer | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $9,082 |
42 | Norman Henley | Eugene, MO 65032 | $9,024 |
43 | Artwin P Ehrhardt | Lohman, MO 65053 | $8,957 |
44 | Harold P Mueller Jr | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $8,867 |
45 | Kevin Kerperin | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $8,843 |
46 | Triple O Farms | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $8,527 |
47 | Leroy Plochberger | Lohman, MO 65053 | $8,492 |
48 | Douglas A Otto | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $8,157 |
49 | Strobel Brothers | Lohman, MO 65053 | $7,964 |
50 | Adam Engelbrecht | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $7,907 |
51 | Lawrence Koenigsfeld | Centertown, MO 65023 | $7,899 |
52 | Randolph H Buschjost | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $7,758 |
53 | Larry Beck | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $7,352 |
54 | Robert B Luebbering | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $7,217 |
55 | David A Boessen | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $7,080 |
56 | Margaret A Beck Living Trust | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $6,492 |
57 | Grt Enterprises -schnieders | Centertown, MO 65023 | $6,402 |
58 | Lepage Brothers | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $6,294 |
59 | Florence Hagner | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $6,280 |
60 | David Richter Jr | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $6,242 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”