Counter Cyclical Program in Cole County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 350
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cole County, Missouri totaled $478,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ralph H Popp | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $3,067 |
42 | Harold W Lepage | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $3,061 |
43 | Roger Lee Bruemmer | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $3,043 |
44 | Catherine Engelbrecht | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $2,920 |
45 | Helen M. Sanning Trust | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $2,783 |
46 | D Kent Mcnutt Revocable Trust | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $2,763 |
47 | David L Jobe | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $2,736 |
48 | Robert B Luebbering | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $2,735 |
49 | David Lee Boessen | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $2,720 |
50 | Leo R Schulte | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $2,713 |
51 | Terry Edward Bleich | Jamestown, MO 65046 | $2,638 |
52 | Leroy Plochberger | Lohman, MO 65053 | $2,541 |
53 | Ralph Berhorst | Freeburg, MO 65035 | $2,487 |
54 | Alfred Schmidt | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $2,448 |
55 | Paul Wagner Lepage | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $2,429 |
56 | Strobel Brothers | Lohman, MO 65053 | $2,422 |
57 | Keith W Fletcher | Centertown, MO 65023 | $2,317 |
58 | Cassmeyer Farms | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $2,264 |
59 | Norman Henley | Eugene, MO 65032 | $2,232 |
60 | David Richter Jr | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $2,069 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”