Total Commodity Programs in Cole County, Missouri, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 367
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cole County, Missouri totaled $2,350,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Doris Mae Propst | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $27,489 |
22 | Sanning Brothers LLC | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $25,874 |
23 | George Leo Luebbering | Koeltztown, MO 65048 | $24,994 |
24 | Jason Plochberger | Lohman, MO 65053 | $22,813 |
25 | Leroy Plochberger | Lohman, MO 65053 | $21,292 |
26 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $21,278 |
27 | Samuel R Kempker | Henley, MO 65040 | $20,880 |
28 | Dale E Prenger | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $19,880 |
29 | Lawrence Koenigsfeld | Centertown, MO 65023 | $19,454 |
30 | James Knernschield | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $19,372 |
31 | Paul Wagner Lepage | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $19,046 |
32 | Travis Joseph Roling | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $18,088 |
33 | Popp Brothers' Farms | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $17,836 |
34 | Roger Lee Bruemmer | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $17,597 |
35 | Keith W Fletcher | Centertown, MO 65023 | $17,247 |
36 | Aaron Michael Russell | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $16,701 |
37 | Mrs Lucille A Suthoff | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $16,104 |
38 | Donald Ray Yanskey | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $16,083 |
39 | Jeffrey Kempker | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $15,945 |
40 | Betty Ann Yanskey | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $15,389 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”