Farm Subsidy information
Dade County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Dade County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,935
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dade County, Missouri totaled $126,472,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Andrew Dylan Vanhooser | Dadeville, MO 65635 | $241,433 |
102 | Melvin Eggerman | Lockwood, MO 65682 | $239,761 |
103 | Brenda Spain | South Greenfield, MO 65752 | $232,289 |
104 | Scott Daniel | Arcola, MO 65603 | $228,879 |
105 | Judith K Robinson | Golden City, MO 64748 | $228,625 |
106 | Andrew Ryan Hudspeth | Lockwood, MO 65682 | $227,954 |
107 | Doris Niehoff | Lockwood, MO 65682 | $224,780 |
108 | Eric M Allison | Lockwood, MO 65682 | $220,514 |
109 | Thomas Probert Combs | Golden City, MO 64748 | $217,881 |
110 | Bruce R Townley | Golden City, MO 64748 | $216,642 |
111 | Gary Wilhelm | Golden City, MO 64748 | $216,591 |
112 | Marvin Oeltjen | Lamar, MO 64759 | $213,866 |
113 | Ila Price | Lockwood, MO 65682 | $212,702 |
114 | David P Thomas | Golden City, MO 64748 | $212,418 |
115 | Fred Walters | Kansas City, MO 64113 | $211,738 |
116 | Zachary Daniel | Stockton, MO 65785 | $210,781 |
117 | Gerald Dean Eggerman | South Greenfield, MO 65752 | $210,603 |
118 | Doug Stefan | Golden City, MO 64748 | $205,968 |
119 | Lila Roller | Lockwood, MO 65682 | $204,956 |
120 | Bonaga Buck | Dadeville, MO 65635 | $202,948 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”