Farm Subsidy information
Dallas County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Dallas County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,500
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dallas County, Missouri totaled $27,762,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bill G Hale | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $82,666 |
62 | Howard Miller | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $82,284 |
63 | Vernon Samual Miller | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $81,281 |
64 | Dill Cattle Company, LLC | Phillipsburg, MO 65722 | $81,055 |
65 | Randy Uchtman | Elkland, MO 65644 | $79,979 |
66 | James W Green | Urbana, MO 65767 | $78,827 |
67 | Samuel Dryer Trust | Tunas, MO 65764 | $78,333 |
68 | Matthew Brown | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $78,178 |
69 | Lanny Doty | Elkland, MO 65644 | $77,815 |
70 | Roger Lantz | Springfield, MO 65809 | $77,614 |
71 | Nathan Michael Brown | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $76,734 |
72 | Nathan Nyberg | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $76,354 |
73 | D & G Armstrong Family Farms, Inc | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $76,093 |
74 | Ronald Condren | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $75,760 |
75 | Bryce Bradley | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $75,256 |
76 | Barbara Gullett | Elkland, MO 65644 | $74,701 |
77 | Kenneth Bacon | Fair Grove, MO 65648 | $74,204 |
78 | Brent Hamlet | Louisburg, MO 65685 | $72,930 |
79 | Edmundo Quinonez | Elkland, MO 65644 | $71,451 |
80 | Charlie Mccowan | Urbana, MO 65767 | $71,263 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”