Total Commodity Programs in Dallas County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 395
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Dallas County, Missouri totaled $1,201,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Kevin Legan | Phillipsburg, MO 65722 | $2,250 |
102 | Deborah L Jasinski | Tunas, MO 65764 | $2,239 |
103 | Randall Ray | Fair Grove, MO 65648 | $2,229 |
104 | Terry Lee Kirk | Urbana, MO 65767 | $2,154 |
105 | Darryl L Mabary | Tunas, MO 65764 | $2,150 |
106 | Eddie Caselman | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $2,106 |
107 | Daniel Strickland | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $2,092 |
108 | Harley Michael Vaughn | Conway, MO 65632 | $2,053 |
109 | Daves Family Trust | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $2,047 |
110 | Kirby Vest | Elkland, MO 65644 | $2,043 |
111 | Jerry Duff Trust | Tunas, MO 65764 | $2,042 |
112 | Richard Joe Taylor | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $2,040 |
113 | Logan Pierce | Windyville, MO 65783 | $2,034 |
114 | Marlin Redies | Preston, MO 65732 | $2,010 |
115 | Debbie L Black | Louisburg, MO 65685 | $1,998 |
116 | James K Louderbaugh Trust | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $1,993 |
117 | Claude Strickland Farms LLC | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $1,978 |
118 | Soapweed Gelbvieh Ranch | Phillipsburg, MO 65722 | $1,978 |
119 | Denton Headings | Buffalo, MO 65622 | $1,971 |
120 | Steven Bliss | Long Lane, MO 65590 | $1,970 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”