Farm Subsidy information
Daviess County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Daviess County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 594
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Daviess County, Missouri totaled $11,009,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Nancy A Terry Rev Trust | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $31,188 |
22 | Scott T And Anne F Rauth Living Trust | Kansas City, MO 64111 | $30,855 |
23 | Edward W Foley II Rev Trust | Tonganoxie, KS 66086 | $30,583 |
24 | Randy Wayne Eads | Coffey, MO 64636 | $29,738 |
25 | Jerry R Daniel | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $29,241 |
26 | Rollan Spilker | Kidder, MO 64649 | $28,695 |
27 | Eric B Freestone | Jameson, MO 64647 | $28,284 |
28 | Steven R Schweizer | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $27,977 |
29 | Forty Acres Estate LLC | Winston, MO 64689 | $27,710 |
30 | Egg's Land Co LLC | Springfield, MO 65809 | $27,560 |
31 | Kraig Mort | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $25,861 |
32 | Craig Lambert | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $25,726 |
33 | Barrie Bothwell | Mooresville, MO 64664 | $25,042 |
34 | 30 Entrust Trust Fbo Robert V Olson Ira | Cameron, MO 64429 | $24,852 |
35 | Dennis J Oehring | Manchester, MO 63011 | $24,769 |
36 | John Cowan | Belton, MO 64012 | $24,457 |
37 | Davis Bottom Hilding | Jamesport, MO 64648 | $23,504 |
38 | Colleen L Acord | Waldron, MO 64092 | $23,455 |
39 | Honey Creek Ranch LLC | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $23,138 |
40 | , | $22,971 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”