Total Conservation Programs in Daviess County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 616
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Daviess County, Missouri totaled $4,616,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | B & B Family Farms LLC | Kansas City, MO 64153 | $23,275 |
42 | Dennis J Oehring | Manchester, MO 63011 | $22,904 |
43 | Revocable Living Trust Of Randy And Joyce Eads | Coffey, MO 64636 | $22,822 |
44 | Steven Arthur Mcbee | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $22,647 |
45 | Hopkins Property LLC | Leawood, KS 66211 | $22,254 |
46 | Stanke Family Irrevocable Trust | Shawnee, KS 66218 | $21,855 |
47 | Cynthia Lyn Foley | Tonganoxie, KS 66086 | $21,420 |
48 | On Point Real Estate LLC | Kearney, MO 64060 | $20,894 |
49 | Denise D Youtsey | Altamont, MO 64620 | $20,352 |
50 | Kenneth L Youtsey | Altamont, MO 64620 | $20,352 |
51 | Mark Payne | St Joseph, MO 64507 | $20,351 |
52 | Christopher M Mcdaniel Revocable Trust | Blue Springs, MO 64014 | $20,165 |
53 | John Cowan | Belton, MO 64012 | $20,058 |
54 | Annette Cornett | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $19,751 |
55 | Carolyn Heldenbrand | Winston, MO 64689 | $18,911 |
56 | Alc Farms LLC | Ridgedale, MO 65739 | $18,102 |
57 | Jack Huff | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $17,790 |
58 | Sugar Land Farm LLC | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $17,721 |
59 | Beverly Lang | Winston, MO 64689 | $17,703 |
60 | Denise Hayes | Jamesport, MO 64648 | $17,194 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”