Farm Subsidy information
Daviess County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Daviess County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 594
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Daviess County, Missouri totaled $11,009,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Robert Thomas Cavanaugh Jr | Independence, MO 64052 | $15,466 |
82 | Zach Morrison | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $15,425 |
83 | David Allen Daniel | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $15,285 |
84 | Crump Family Trust | Jamesport, MO 64648 | $15,283 |
85 | Brandon Wayne Eads | Trenton, MO 64683 | $14,884 |
86 | Miller Family Properties LLC | Dawn, MO 64638 | $14,778 |
87 | Janice Pescetto | Kansas City, MO 64133 | $14,751 |
88 | Royce E Brock | Jameson, MO 64647 | $14,723 |
89 | Sylvia Graber | Jamesport, MO 64648 | $14,603 |
90 | Billie Michael Ward | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $14,580 |
91 | Larry N Gann | Grain Valley, MO 64029 | $14,568 |
92 | Greg Landes | Jamesport, MO 64648 | $14,393 |
93 | Wayne Huey | Jamesport, MO 64648 | $14,032 |
94 | Tom Hannawalt | Kidder, MO 64649 | $14,006 |
95 | Nancy J Sandy Revocable Trust | Kidder, MO 64649 | $13,952 |
96 | Earl G Carter | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $13,884 |
97 | Hatchet Jack Conservancy LLC | Boise, ID 83702 | $13,882 |
98 | Powell Ford LLC | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $13,666 |
99 | Austin H Bonnett-bonnett Revocable Liv Tr | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $13,560 |
100 | Kenneth Lee | Winston, MO 64689 | $13,513 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”