Total Conservation Programs in DeKalb County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 264
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in DeKalb County, Missouri totaled $2,126,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Keith Derr Rev Trust - Keith A Derr | Maysville, MO 64469 | $16,962 |
42 | Jack L And Linda L Reynolds Joint Rev Trust | Liberty, MO 64068 | $15,970 |
43 | Barbara Halter | Mission, TX 78572 | $14,995 |
44 | James Russell Moss | Weatherby, MO 64497 | $14,434 |
45 | Pittsenbarger Partnership Farms | Maysville, MO 64469 | $14,222 |
46 | Brent Elliott | Stewartsville, MO 64490 | $14,135 |
47 | Gordon Sunderland | Kansas City, MO 64151 | $13,909 |
48 | Connie Osborn | Maysville, MO 64469 | $13,705 |
49 | Janice Gaiser | Osborn, MO 64474 | $13,381 |
50 | Roger Gaiser | Osborn, MO 64474 | $13,381 |
51 | Keith Meek | Cameron, MO 64429 | $13,356 |
52 | Jack Sealey | Weatherby, MO 64497 | $12,946 |
53 | Janet Ronczkowski | Cameron, MO 64429 | $12,691 |
54 | Sharon L Smith | Osborn, MO 64474 | $12,496 |
55 | Spiking Farms LLC | King City, MO 64463 | $12,256 |
56 | Birt W Mcclure Family Trust | Des Moines, IA 50309 | $12,078 |
57 | Day Miller | Maysville, MO 64469 | $11,940 |
58 | John Mcfall | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $11,615 |
59 | Dwight C Ueligger | Savannah, MO 64485 | $11,375 |
60 | Charles F Utz LLC | San Antonio, TX 78212 | $11,182 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”