Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in DeKalb County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 104
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in DeKalb County, Missouri totaled $310,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ernest E Hutchcraft | Union Star, MO 64494 | $1,863 |
62 | Billy Meek | Maysville, MO 64469 | $1,834 |
63 | Allan W Turner | Cameron, MO 64429 | $1,743 |
64 | Owen Family Spendthrift Trust | Lawson, MO 64062 | $1,639 |
65 | Gladys L Cobb | Maysville, MO 64469 | $1,572 |
66 | Dennis Findley | Osborn, MO 64474 | $1,511 |
67 | Dennis Gann | Clarksdale, MO 64430 | $1,498 |
68 | Herald Sadler | Amity, MO 64422 | $1,467 |
69 | Douglas Gregory Mccrea | Maysville, MO 64469 | $1,412 |
70 | Gromer Hines Farms Inc | Saint Joseph, MO 64507 | $1,358 |
71 | Mary Alice Forbes | Redding, CA 96001 | $1,314 |
72 | John R Stafford Jr | Kansas City, MO 64137 | $1,311 |
73 | Thomas & Ryan | Trenton, MO 64683 | $1,283 |
74 | Elmer Rogers | Clarksdale, MO 64430 | $1,250 |
75 | Ronald L Burris | Clarksdale, MO 64430 | $1,237 |
76 | Gary Johnson | Clarksdale, MO 64430 | $1,236 |
77 | Beverly Graeff | Osborn, MO 64474 | $1,229 |
78 | Richard Ebersold | Saint Joseph, MO 64505 | $1,204 |
79 | Donald Deaver | King City, MO 64463 | $1,201 |
80 | Lewis Lee Shifflett | Amity, MO 64422 | $1,170 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”