Production Flexibility Program in DeKalb County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,022
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in DeKalb County, Missouri totaled $7,866,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | James Runyan | Stewartsville, MO 64490 | $20,132 |
102 | Kenneth Harold Keesaman | Osborn, MO 64474 | $20,033 |
103 | Albert Smith | Maysville, MO 64469 | $19,892 |
104 | Triple B Trucking Inc | Clarksdale, MO 64430 | $19,825 |
105 | Ronnie E Cole | Weatherby, MO 64497 | $19,744 |
106 | Randall Mason | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $19,695 |
107 | Dean Gilbert Estate | King City, MO 64463 | $19,596 |
108 | Donald Wald Trust | Liberty, MO 64069 | $19,538 |
109 | Jim D Gregg | Maysville, MO 64469 | $19,235 |
110 | Richard Alan Brown | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $18,961 |
111 | Robert Lee Hutchcraft | Union Star, MO 64494 | $18,692 |
112 | Carl J Haan Sr | Maysville, MO 64469 | $18,624 |
113 | Townsend Brothers | Union Star, MO 64494 | $18,468 |
114 | James O Strong | Rolla, MO 65401 | $18,446 |
115 | David Powell | Stewartsville, MO 64490 | $18,430 |
116 | Roger Gene Eulinger & Kathey Mae Eulinger Rev Tr | Maysville, MO 64469 | $18,319 |
117 | Arnold Shipp | Saint Joseph, MO 64505 | $18,258 |
118 | Stuart Maize | Amity, MO 64422 | $18,208 |
119 | David Peterson | Amity, MO 64422 | $18,123 |
120 | Fred W Maize | Union Star, MO 64494 | $17,978 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”