Conservation Reserve Program in DeKalb County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 315
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in DeKalb County, Missouri totaled $2,181,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Lewis D Andrews | Savannah, MO 64485 | $4,635 |
142 | Boyd Family Trust | Weatherby, MO 64497 | $4,625 |
143 | Gregory E Berry Trust | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $4,464 |
144 | Kenneth L Cox | Kingston, MO 64650 | $4,443 |
145 | Richard Patrick Post | Maysville, MO 64469 | $4,365 |
146 | Katherine Salisbury | Joplin, MO 64804 | $4,306 |
147 | Gary M Gagnon | Saint Joseph, MO 64506 | $4,290 |
148 | Jennifer R Dewilde | Maysville, MO 64469 | $4,205 |
149 | Dennis E Marshall | Cameron, MO 64429 | $4,186 |
150 | Velma L Seuferling | Cameron, MO 64429 | $4,177 |
151 | Rae Ann Jenkins | Plattsburg, MO 64477 | $4,167 |
152 | Burgess Family Farm LLC | Union Star, MO 64494 | $4,144 |
153 | Sterling Silver | Osborn, MO 64474 | $4,127 |
154 | Joni Zimmerman | Clarksdale, MO 64430 | $4,120 |
155 | Laurel Lee Burton-goff - Laurel Lee Burton Trust | Edcouch, TX 78538 | $4,034 |
156 | Dana Hansen | Kansas City, MO 64118 | $3,780 |
157 | Twyla Lorraine Gibson Trust | Polo, MO 64671 | $3,728 |
158 | Charlie Carroll | Cameron, MO 64429 | $3,649 |
159 | Brad Hutchcraft | Kansas City, MO 64117 | $3,639 |
160 | Max R Shelman And Nancy L Shelman Trust | Cameron, MO 64429 | $3,622 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”