Counter Cyclical Program in Dunklin County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,342
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Dunklin County, Missouri totaled $70,410,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Terry Lynn Fuller | Kennett, MO 63857 | $200,871 |
102 | Phillip David Emmons | Kennett, MO 63857 | $200,541 |
103 | John Lawrence Fritz | Senath, MO 63876 | $196,186 |
104 | Robby Dean Shrum | Senath, MO 63876 | $193,782 |
105 | Carlos Edward Jackson Jr | Senath, MO 63876 | $192,252 |
106 | Pamela Kay Jackson | Senath, MO 63876 | $191,369 |
107 | Richard Scott Williams | Kennett, MO 63857 | $191,142 |
108 | Jerry Lyman Moore | Kennett, MO 63857 | $186,431 |
109 | Alice Kaye Gibson | Arbyrd, MO 63821 | $183,972 |
110 | Mark Lee Cannon | Senath, MO 63876 | $183,637 |
111 | Lonnie Dale Gibson Sr | Arbyrd, MO 63821 | $183,291 |
112 | Randal Holmes Gibson | Senath, MO 63876 | $180,009 |
113 | Glen E Richardson | Kennett, MO 63857 | $176,132 |
114 | David Arthur Vaughn | Cardwell, MO 63829 | $170,284 |
115 | Joe Blakemore | Campbell, MO 63933 | $169,160 |
116 | Young Farms | Kennett, MO 63857 | $165,528 |
117 | Freddy L Chandler | Senath, MO 63876 | $164,118 |
118 | Danny Carl Blankenship | Mountain Home, AR 72653 | $163,551 |
119 | Felts Farm Ptr | Paragould, AR 72450 | $163,292 |
120 | Gerald Wayne Tackeberry | Kennett, MO 63857 | $159,464 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”