Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 465
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Missouri totaled $3,942,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Warren Dierker Jr | Lonedell, MO 63060 | $12,996 |
22 | James R Lechten | Bourbon, MO 65441 | $12,456 |
23 | Steven Glen Unnerstall | Beaufort, MO 63013 | $12,159 |
24 | Charles Schroer | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $12,003 |
25 | , | $11,814 | |
26 | Ray E Cunio | Sullivan, MO 63080 | $11,791 |
27 | Michael Dierking | New Haven, MO 63068 | $11,477 |
28 | Michelle Stone Dba Crossbreed Cattle Company, LLC | Washington, MO 63090 | $11,206 |
29 | Vedder & Homeyer Farm Partnership | New Haven, MO 63068 | $11,064 |
30 | David Brune | New Haven, MO 63068 | $10,954 |
31 | Falling Timber Farm LLC | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $10,822 |
32 | D&d Land & Cattle LLC | Lonedell, MO 63060 | $10,680 |
33 | Wilson Farm, LLC | Dittmer, MO 63023 | $10,580 |
34 | Adam Robert Hecht | Sullivan, MO 63080 | $10,555 |
35 | Roger Eugene Bardot | Lonedell, MO 63060 | $10,530 |
36 | Koch Cattle LLC | Berger, MO 63014 | $10,411 |
37 | Kevin Steineker | Gerald, MO 63037 | $10,258 |
38 | Robby Berti Jr | Sullivan, MO 63080 | $10,199 |
39 | Joseph Long | Berger, MO 63014 | $10,175 |
40 | Richard Hecht | Gerald, MO 63037 | $9,698 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”