Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 140
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Missouri totaled $2,380,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Barrett James Geatley | Lonedell, MO 63060 | $3,677 |
42 | Keith Ratcliff | Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 | $3,676 |
43 | Esther Hoemann Family Trust U/a July 30, 2020 | New Haven, MO 63068 | $3,672 |
44 | Gerald Theodore Meyer | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $3,657 |
45 | Dorothea Jean Harrison | Union, MO 63084 | $3,318 |
46 | Roy George Kramme | Sullivan, MO 63080 | $3,301 |
47 | Duane L Walkenhorst | New Haven, MO 63068 | $3,284 |
48 | Howard Wayne Groner Rev Trust U/a 06-11-1998 | Berger, MO 63014 | $3,107 |
49 | Joan M Gilbreath | Manchester, MO 63021 | $3,099 |
50 | Vedder Dairy Farm LLC | New Haven, MO 63068 | $3,049 |
51 | Tri Pointe LLC | Hillsboro, MO 63050 | $3,049 |
52 | Niemeyer Farm Inc | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $3,020 |
53 | Stephen W Luecker | New Haven, MO 63068 | $2,849 |
54 | R Ley Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $2,774 |
55 | Gerling Farms L.l.c. | New Haven, MO 63068 | $2,687 |
56 | Joseph Dickinson | Lonedell, MO 63060 | $2,649 |
57 | Ebker Farms LLC | Rosebud, MO 63091 | $2,539 |
58 | Haberberger Family Trust | Fenton, MO 63026 | $2,441 |
59 | Jerrold J Van Deven | Pacific, MO 63069 | $2,225 |
60 | Perry D Pecaut | New Haven, MO 63068 | $2,213 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”