Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,642
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Missouri totaled $91,141,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Roy George Kramme | Sullivan, MO 63080 | $96,902 |
142 | Steve Stumpe | Leslie, MO 63056 | $96,838 |
143 | Glennon F Holdmeyer | Washington, MO 63090 | $96,687 |
144 | Bill Mclaren | Pacific, MO 63069 | $96,558 |
145 | Rethemeyer Farms Inc | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $96,420 |
146 | Brinker Farms Inc | Auxvasse, MO 65231 | $96,349 |
147 | Andrew L Glosemeyer And Cand C Glosemeyer Rev Tr | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $95,999 |
148 | James A Struckhoff Jr | Washington, MO 63090 | $95,406 |
149 | Donald Eckelkamp | Washington, MO 63090 | $95,257 |
150 | Roman J Schroeder | Washington, MO 63090 | $94,186 |
151 | Ardell Hellmann | Labadie, MO 63055 | $93,387 |
152 | Todd Westermeyer | New Haven, MO 63068 | $93,142 |
153 | Norvin L Mohesky | Berger, MO 63014 | $92,567 |
154 | Tim A Hellebusch | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $92,069 |
155 | David E Danz | Bland, MO 65014 | $91,919 |
156 | Meadow Oaks Farm Inc | Saint Louis, MO 63122 | $90,677 |
157 | Winston T Brunjes | Villa Ridge, MO 63089 | $89,697 |
158 | Eugene Narup | Villa Ridge, MO 63089 | $89,600 |
159 | Harold Brandt | New Haven, MO 63068 | $89,236 |
160 | David Menke | Berger, MO 63014 | $88,994 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”