Direct Payment Program in Franklin County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,110
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Franklin County, Missouri totaled $9,916,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Alfred F Bolte Revocable Living T | Beaufort, MO 63013 | $14,881 |
142 | Adolph A Poese And Carolyn B Poese Jrlt 2020- | New Haven, MO 63068 | $14,656 |
143 | Robert A Bardot | Lonedell, MO 63060 | $14,510 |
144 | Timothy D Stahlman | Union, MO 63084 | $14,484 |
145 | Robert Brandhorst | Gerald, MO 63037 | $14,468 |
146 | James Althen | New Haven, MO 63068 | $14,409 |
147 | Larry Schwoeppe | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $14,276 |
148 | Harold Brandt | New Haven, MO 63068 | $14,249 |
149 | John And Joe Brandt General Partnership | New Haven, MO 63068 | $14,241 |
150 | Theresa M Straatmann | Beaufort, MO 63013 | $13,963 |
151 | Noel Vieten | Leslie, MO 63056 | $13,936 |
152 | Pin Oak Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $13,687 |
153 | Roman J Schroeder | Washington, MO 63090 | $13,555 |
154 | Rick Dierker Farms LLC | Lonedell, MO 63060 | $13,493 |
155 | Darwin Kraus | Pacific, MO 63069 | $13,397 |
156 | Glenn Kamper | Gerald, MO 63037 | $13,389 |
157 | K & R Farm | New Haven, MO 63068 | $13,210 |
158 | Ralph A Fournier Living Trust | Saint Louis, MO 63144 | $12,707 |
159 | Gerlemann Bros | New Haven, MO 63068 | $12,693 |
160 | Marvin J Pehle | Berger, MO 63014 | $12,685 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”