Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 893
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Missouri totaled $11,241,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Charles Schroer | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $58,724 |
22 | Huellinghoff Farm Inc | Union, MO 63084 | $56,341 |
23 | Allan & Dale Piontek Farms LLC | Washington, MO 63090 | $56,304 |
24 | Alt Farm LLC | Pacific, MO 63069 | $56,062 |
25 | Todd Geisert | Washington, MO 63090 | $54,911 |
26 | Kluesner Farms LLC | Washington, MO 63090 | $53,088 |
27 | Gerling Farms L.l.c. | New Haven, MO 63068 | $50,862 |
28 | Jacob James Wesselschmidt | New Haven, MO 63068 | $50,605 |
29 | Drew E Pehle Living Trust | Washington, MO 63090 | $49,470 |
30 | R Ley Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $49,026 |
31 | Douglas A Hoeft | Beaufort, MO 63013 | $48,501 |
32 | Wayne Diermann | Dutzow, MO 63342 | $45,961 |
33 | Adam Joseph Hackmann | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $44,673 |
34 | Troy Blaue | Gerald, MO 63037 | $44,578 |
35 | Raymond Joseph Schroeder | Washington, MO 63090 | $44,516 |
36 | Steve Shofner | Lonedell, MO 63060 | $43,023 |
37 | Pin Oak Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $41,959 |
38 | David Michael Schwoeppe | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $41,548 |
39 | Niemeyer Farm Inc | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $41,472 |
40 | Carl Farms | Berger, MO 63014 | $41,230 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”