Total Commodity Programs in Franklin County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,033
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Franklin County, Missouri totaled $52,922,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Deppe Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $3,261,055 |
2 | Scheer Agri-enterprises, Inc. | New Haven, MO 63068 | $2,392,908 |
3 | Maczuk Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $1,569,961 |
4 | Kloppe Dairy Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $1,368,099 |
5 | Riegel Dairy, Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $1,284,896 |
6 | Riegel Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $1,221,430 |
7 | Edward George Heisel | Labadie, MO 63055 | $1,067,332 |
8 | Hoemann Farms, Inc. % | Berger, MO 63014 | $1,038,873 |
9 | Freitag Farms, Inc. | New Haven, MO 63068 | $647,526 |
10 | Scheers Dairy Farm LLC | New Haven, MO 63068 | $633,051 |
11 | Overschmidt Farms Inc | Union, MO 63084 | $616,298 |
12 | Piontek Farms, L.l.c. | Washington, MO 63090 | $562,081 |
13 | Three Oaks Farms Inc | Augusta, MO 63332 | $543,197 |
14 | Westhaven Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $516,620 |
15 | Kopmann Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $504,743 |
16 | Brunjes Family Farms LLC | Labadie, MO 63055 | $504,284 |
17 | Alt Farm LLC | Pacific, MO 63069 | $479,275 |
18 | R Ley Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $458,205 |
19 | Carl Farms | Berger, MO 63014 | $455,602 |
20 | Randolph Joseph Klenke | Union, MO 63084 | $374,869 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>