Counter Cyclical Program in Gentry County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 845
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Gentry County, Missouri totaled $2,286,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gentry Dekalb Fertilizer Inc | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $18,510 |
22 | Larry Miller | Albany, MO 64402 | $18,054 |
23 | Michael Scott Harris | King City, MO 64463 | $17,924 |
24 | Leo L Barnes | Albany, MO 64402 | $17,683 |
25 | Lyle Junior Powell | Albany, MO 64402 | $17,209 |
26 | Birdsell Farms Inc | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $17,195 |
27 | Max Gage Farms Inc | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $17,058 |
28 | Ronald Murray | New Hampton, MO 64471 | $16,536 |
29 | Guess Farms Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $16,268 |
30 | Paul Richard Parsons | Albany, MO 64402 | $15,744 |
31 | Stephen L Mcquinn | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $15,046 |
32 | Phillips Farm Serv Inc | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $14,859 |
33 | Rick Rainey | King City, MO 64463 | $14,644 |
34 | Alan Mcconkey Farms Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $14,005 |
35 | Kenneth Lee Mcginley | Albany, MO 64402 | $13,166 |
36 | William R Jones | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $13,028 |
37 | Pamela Jon Carlson | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $13,025 |
38 | Thomas R Jones | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $13,025 |
39 | Stevens Farms Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $12,709 |
40 | Eugene Stoll | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $12,390 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”