Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Gentry County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 279
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Gentry County, Missouri totaled $726,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Donald Grantham | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $2,900 |
62 | Scott Lane | Clyde, MO 64432 | $2,899 |
63 | Rob Noble | Albany, MO 64402 | $2,895 |
64 | Christopher Allenbrand | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $2,891 |
65 | Waltemath/parsons Farms Inc | King City, MO 64463 | $2,866 |
66 | Anthony Glenn Washburn | King City, MO 64463 | $2,838 |
67 | David Stoll | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $2,817 |
68 | Simon Parsons | King City, MO 64463 | $2,761 |
69 | Adam Eiberger | King City, MO 64463 | $2,662 |
70 | Harold Schmitz Rev Trust | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $2,660 |
71 | John Mcmillan | King City, MO 64463 | $2,501 |
72 | Brian Summa | Darlington, MO 64438 | $2,485 |
73 | Ryan L Messner-ryan L Messner Rev Tr Lewis Messner | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $2,483 |
74 | David Lee Garland | Darlington, MO 64438 | $2,459 |
75 | Carl E Boone | King City, MO 64463 | $2,449 |
76 | Robert L Luke | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $2,434 |
77 | Roger Wink | Martinsville, MO 64467 | $2,405 |
78 | Anthony Joseph Fletchall | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $2,373 |
79 | Terry Schieber | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $2,365 |
80 | Kevin R Heyde | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $2,329 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”