Conservation Reserve Program in Gentry County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,877
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Gentry County, Missouri totaled $123,971,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Phyllis Owens | King City, MO 64463 | $387,097 |
62 | Rosemarie Mercer | King City, MO 64463 | $383,147 |
63 | William M Grace | Saint Joseph, MO 64502 | $380,695 |
64 | Harvey Walters | King City, MO 64463 | $371,350 |
65 | Waltraud Evans | Kansas City, MO 64112 | $359,993 |
66 | David Inman Sr | Anchor Point, AK 99556 | $357,355 |
67 | Akers Farm Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $355,601 |
68 | Herbert M Zaccagnini | Pleasant Hill, MO 64080 | $354,504 |
69 | Gardner Brothers | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $350,200 |
70 | Gary Ochsner | Clive, IA 50325 | $346,852 |
71 | Dean G Meyer | Guilford, MO 64457 | $346,253 |
72 | Carolyn A Parsons Rev Trust | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $335,905 |
73 | Mary Mcginley | Darlington, MO 64438 | $328,317 |
74 | John R Lober | Kansas City, MO 64154 | $325,650 |
75 | Rigney Family Trust | Darlington, MO 64438 | $325,141 |
76 | Trust Agreement Of Mary Jo Zaccagnini | Pleasant Hill, MO 64080 | $321,840 |
77 | Rev Trust Agreement Of Carolyn Brown | Leawood, KS 66209 | $320,435 |
78 | Ann Kathyrn Grace | Saint Joseph, MO 64502 | $319,356 |
79 | Lori C Lober | Kansas City, MO 64154 | $319,188 |
80 | River Bend Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $317,698 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”