Market Loss Assistance Program in Gentry County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,080
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Gentry County, Missouri totaled $5,297,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | King Flowers Seigfreid Trust | Mexico, MO 65265 | $19,348 |
62 | Ronald Stoll | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $18,888 |
63 | Robin Eugene Reidlinger | Albany, MO 64402 | $18,510 |
64 | Charles Findley | Gentry, MO 64453 | $18,481 |
65 | Herb Derks Rev Trust | King City, MO 64463 | $18,419 |
66 | V B Garland | Darlington, MO 64438 | $18,384 |
67 | Wayne L Law | King City, MO 64463 | $18,326 |
68 | Mccrea's Inc | King City, MO 64463 | $18,038 |
69 | Larry Dean Slayden | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $18,031 |
70 | Kenneth L Derks | King City, MO 64463 | $17,952 |
71 | John Burl Owens | King City, MO 64463 | $17,855 |
72 | Philip Martin Kerwin | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $17,786 |
73 | Eugene Stoll | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $17,293 |
74 | David Waltemath | Independence, MO 64057 | $17,126 |
75 | Randall Dean Hulet | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $16,978 |
76 | Townsend Brothers | Union Star, MO 64494 | $16,868 |
77 | Bobby Dale Skidmore And Donna Ski | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $16,822 |
78 | Hubert E Luke And Beatrice M Luke Rev Trust | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $16,676 |
79 | Jonathan Ray Hulet | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $16,675 |
80 | Peter A Medsker | King City, MO 64463 | $16,344 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”