Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Gentry County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 326
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Gentry County, Missouri totaled $9,891,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Abe R Burton | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $19,987 |
102 | Tracey G Wright | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $19,956 |
103 | John W Muff | King City, MO 64463 | $19,778 |
104 | Phillip E Peery | Darlington, MO 64438 | $19,539 |
105 | Blake J Meyer | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $19,369 |
106 | David L Waltemath Living Trust | Independence, MO 64057 | $18,889 |
107 | Philip Martin Kerwin | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $18,260 |
108 | Sk Farms LLC | Albany, MO 64402 | $17,582 |
109 | James Luke | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $17,505 |
110 | Robert Richard Reidlinger | Darlington, MO 64438 | $17,442 |
111 | Dwight Hopkins | Albany, MO 64402 | $17,375 |
112 | Jerry Gilbert | King City, MO 64463 | $17,328 |
113 | George E Carroll And Mary H Carroll Rev Trust | Grant City, MO 64456 | $17,326 |
114 | Blake Joseph Meyer | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $17,302 |
115 | Robert Schieber | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $17,296 |
116 | Hubert E Luke And Beatrice M Luke Rev Trust | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $17,024 |
117 | Scott Gage | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $16,584 |
118 | David Luke | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $16,549 |
119 | David Gregory | Albany, MO 64402 | $16,076 |
120 | Kevin Gerard Stoll | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $15,836 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”