Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Gentry County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 279
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Gentry County, Missouri totaled $726,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Doug Delaney | King City, MO 64463 | $1,608 |
122 | Matthew David Luke | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $1,584 |
123 | Darrell Hardin | Albany, MO 64402 | $1,579 |
124 | Robert W Muff | King City, MO 64463 | $1,555 |
125 | Ronald G Strueby And Janet F Strueby Rev Trust | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $1,505 |
126 | David Mcghee | New Hampton, MO 64471 | $1,491 |
127 | Boyd L Koch | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $1,487 |
128 | Kevin Schieber | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $1,462 |
129 | Kerry Allen Paul | Albany, MO 64402 | $1,423 |
130 | Mark L Plymell | New Hampton, MO 64471 | $1,421 |
131 | John Robbin Hensley | King City, MO 64463 | $1,389 |
132 | Rex Dakota Messner | Darlington, MO 64438 | $1,377 |
133 | Ronald & Pamela Jeffries Rev Tr Dtd 3-28-97 | Mcfall, MO 64657 | $1,377 |
134 | Milton Sager | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $1,363 |
135 | Jeremiah Julius Wink | Martinsville, MO 64467 | $1,351 |
136 | Russell King III | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $1,348 |
137 | Leon Wiederholt | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $1,347 |
138 | Clayton J Ford | Weatherby, MO 64497 | $1,332 |
139 | Bernie Summa | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $1,326 |
140 | Randy Holcomb | Albany, MO 64402 | $1,290 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”