Total Disaster Programs in Gentry County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,109
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Gentry County, Missouri totaled $21,719,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Terry Newcomer | Guilford, MO 64457 | $43,056 |
122 | Jeffery A Crain | Kansas City, MO 64157 | $41,258 |
123 | Pamela Crain | Kansas City, MO 64157 | $41,258 |
124 | David Stoll | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $41,230 |
125 | Kendall Dale Smith | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $41,142 |
126 | Darin Gilbert | King City, MO 64463 | $40,651 |
127 | David Michael Strough | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $40,546 |
128 | Ronald Murray | New Hampton, MO 64471 | $40,003 |
129 | Ronnie Stoll Farms LLC | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $39,843 |
130 | Joel Kemp | King City, MO 64463 | $39,836 |
131 | Dwight Hopkins | Albany, MO 64402 | $39,725 |
132 | David Lee Garland | Darlington, MO 64438 | $39,490 |
133 | David Ray Lynch Irrev Trust | Albany, MO 64402 | $38,645 |
134 | Gary William Fell | Bayard, IA 50029 | $38,632 |
135 | Ryan L Messner-ryan L Messner Rev Tr Lewis Messner | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $38,462 |
136 | Dennis Roger Luke | Lees Summit, MO 64086 | $38,074 |
137 | Kelly Stoll | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $38,021 |
138 | John & Patty Derks Farms Inc. | King City, MO 64463 | $37,691 |
139 | Dennis Eugene Redden | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $36,949 |
140 | Ginther Farms Inc | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $36,856 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”