Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Gentry County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 521
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Gentry County, Missouri totaled $1,887,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Eugene Stoll | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $15,027 |
22 | Findley Boys Partnership | Albany, MO 64402 | $14,028 |
23 | Alan Martin Kerwin | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $13,365 |
24 | Hubert E Luke And Beatrice M Luke Rev Trust | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $13,341 |
25 | Kenneth Lee Mcginley | Albany, MO 64402 | $13,203 |
26 | Max R Wagers | Topeka, KS 66610 | $12,126 |
27 | Lloyd Glen Walker Rev Living Trus | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $12,002 |
28 | Jim Stulz | King City, MO 64463 | $11,869 |
29 | Guess Farms Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $11,542 |
30 | Cottrill Brothers | Albany, MO 64402 | $11,470 |
31 | Robert Schieber | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $11,363 |
32 | Bernard Eiberger | King City, MO 64463 | $11,278 |
33 | David Eiberger | King City, MO 64463 | $11,225 |
34 | Max Gage Farms Inc | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $11,183 |
35 | Stevens Farms Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $10,917 |
36 | Rick Rainey | King City, MO 64463 | $10,817 |
37 | Arthur Hugh Walker | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $10,513 |
38 | Jim Gard | Ravenwood, MO 64479 | $10,482 |
39 | Donald Eiberger | King City, MO 64463 | $10,460 |
40 | Waltemath Farms Inc | King City, MO 64463 | $10,454 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”