Production Flexibility Program in Gentry County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,255
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Gentry County, Missouri totaled $9,784,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cottrill Brothers | Albany, MO 64402 | $66,254 |
22 | Guess Farms Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $63,339 |
23 | Max Gage Farms Inc | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $61,754 |
24 | Gentry Dekalb Fertilizer Inc | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $59,329 |
25 | Leonard Joseph Wilmes | Princeton, MO 64673 | $58,614 |
26 | Doug Walker Farms | Gentry, MO 64453 | $57,541 |
27 | Mike Waltemath Revocable Trust | King City, MO 64463 | $57,288 |
28 | Alan Mcconkey Farms Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $53,741 |
29 | Teel Farms Inc | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $53,579 |
30 | Paul Richard Parsons | Albany, MO 64402 | $52,088 |
31 | Charles N Trump 7-23-75 Rev Farm | Albany, MO 64402 | $51,884 |
32 | William R Jones | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $51,312 |
33 | Thomas R Jones | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $51,311 |
34 | Lloyd Glen Walker Rev Living Trus | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $50,798 |
35 | Stevens Farms Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $50,297 |
36 | D & B Gregory Farms Inc | Albany, MO 64402 | $50,032 |
37 | Lyle Junior Powell | Albany, MO 64402 | $49,391 |
38 | Kenneth Lee Mcginley | Albany, MO 64402 | $49,329 |
39 | John Richard Derks | King City, MO 64463 | $49,111 |
40 | Richard Jennings | Stanberry, MO 64489 | $48,835 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”