Farm Subsidy information
Greene County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Greene County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,819
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Greene County, Missouri totaled $30,436,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Thomas Bowers | Walnut Grove, MO 65770 | $93,736 |
62 | Ruth Elaine Mclean | Republic, MO 65738 | $91,872 |
63 | C Stanley Kirby | Fair Grove, MO 65648 | $90,683 |
64 | Owen Brothers Cattle Co. LLC. | Bois D Arc, MO 65612 | $90,497 |
65 | Philip Davidson | Republic, MO 65738 | $89,752 |
66 | Dustin James Luttrell | Republic, MO 65738 | $89,324 |
67 | James Delzell Tucker II | Willard, MO 65781 | $85,768 |
68 | Jerry Rex Horton | Springfield, MO 65809 | $84,440 |
69 | Corlett Farms | Willard, MO 65781 | $84,123 |
70 | Johnelle Little | Republic, MO 65738 | $82,468 |
71 | Bradley D Rummel | Springfield, MO 65802 | $80,777 |
72 | Marion D West | Springfield, MO 65802 | $80,775 |
73 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $78,654 |
74 | William Larry White | Rogersville, MO 65742 | $77,973 |
75 | Paula S Daniel | Walnut Grove, MO 65770 | $77,463 |
76 | Eric Bowers | Walnut Grove, MO 65770 | $77,153 |
77 | William Kary | Brookline Sta, MO 65619 | $76,684 |
78 | Charles Turk | Springfield, MO 65802 | $76,028 |
79 | Michael R Coale | Ash Grove, MO 65604 | $74,160 |
80 | Rayburn Stanton | Ash Grove, MO 65604 | $71,042 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”