Conservation Reserve Program in Harrison County, Missouri, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,547

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Harrison County, Missouri totaled $186,263,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
41Michael NordwaldKansas City, MO 64157$606,444
42Robert C SmithWichita, KS 67207$606,390
43Gary Mac RaganEl Dorado Springs, MO 64744$600,708
44Nature Calls LLCMc Fall, MO 64657$581,533
45Lowell R JundySanta Clarita, CA 91390$570,416
46Dean D McdonaldMerrill, WI 54452$564,753
47Kenneth TannerTenafly, NJ 07670$564,620
48Decatur Classic Agri EnterprisesLamoni, IA 50140$558,489
49Pete And Stacey Karns TrustNew Hampton, MO 64471$557,706
50Mary M BrantGilman City, MO 64642$545,990
51Guerdon Voigts Revocable TrustBelmont, WI 53510$541,267
52Thomas And Charlene Hermansen TrustCassville, MO 65625$536,894
53Jay And Mary Owen TrustIndependence, MO 64057$511,647
54Donald R Luisi Revocable TrustSaint Charles, MO 63301$510,480
55Carol R Runyan Rev TrustBethany, MO 64424$510,016
56Ronald Baker FormanMansfield, TX 76063$507,267
57Thomas HoppeKansas City, MO 64116$506,825
58James A Hendren-hendren Family TrustRidgeway, MO 64481$505,516
59Kenneth And Marjory Howe Rev TrustAmes, IA 50010$499,744
60Rex Hill EstateGrant City, MO 64456$499,685

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag