Loan Deficiency in Harrison County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 925
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Harrison County, Missouri totaled $11,596,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | M F & C Inc | Bethany, MO 64424 | $46,857 |
62 | Chris Ward Farms Inc | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $46,747 |
63 | Denise Sperry | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $44,245 |
64 | Terry And Linda Cox Revocable Trust | Eagleville, MO 64442 | $43,539 |
65 | Cox Living Trust | Eagleville, MO 64442 | $42,958 |
66 | Harold Mcchesney | Hatfield, MO 64458 | $42,245 |
67 | Michael Tuggle | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $41,678 |
68 | Robert Wayne Allen | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $41,160 |
69 | Joann And Kenneth Meek Trust | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $41,049 |
70 | Virginia M Meek Estate | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $41,049 |
71 | Norman Kimbrough Trust | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $40,592 |
72 | Jeff Ward | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $40,374 |
73 | Bill Arney | Bethany, MO 64424 | $40,363 |
74 | Leonard-stobbe Rev Living Trust | Eagleville, MO 64442 | $39,185 |
75 | Jim F Alden Revocable Trust | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $38,983 |
76 | Sharon J Fenimore Revocable Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $38,933 |
77 | Jack Fenimore | Bethany, MO 64424 | $38,933 |
78 | Larry Cracraft | Albany, MO 64402 | $38,532 |
79 | Jewell And Ethyl Maize Living Tru | Pattonsburg, MO 64670 | $37,426 |
80 | Mary Forman | Mansfield, TX 76063 | $37,271 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”