Market Gains in Harrison County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 131
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Harrison County, Missouri totaled $2,752,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John F Seltman | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $7,571 |
62 | John Lewis Jones | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $7,527 |
63 | Larry Wayne Francis | Blythedale, MO 64426 | $7,234 |
64 | Rodger Thompson | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $6,920 |
65 | Joann And Kenneth Meek Trust | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $6,783 |
66 | Virginia M Meek Estate | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $6,783 |
67 | Ronald Lavern Richardson | Hatfield, MO 64458 | $6,255 |
68 | Nathan Terhune | Jamesport, MO 64648 | $5,971 |
69 | Bill Joe Reno | Eagleville, MO 64442 | $5,694 |
70 | Emery Worth Vandivert & Leah F Va | Bethany, MO 64424 | $5,658 |
71 | Florence Thompson | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $5,316 |
72 | Leonard-stobbe Rev Living Trust | Eagleville, MO 64442 | $5,074 |
73 | Garvin Clifford Moulin | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $4,640 |
74 | Decatur Classic Agri Enterprises | Lamoni, IA 50140 | $4,592 |
75 | Shannon Wayne Ratliff | Trenton, MO 64683 | $4,367 |
76 | James Mathews | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $4,318 |
77 | Gregory L Fenimore | Mc Fall, MO 64657 | $4,252 |
78 | Harold Mcchesney | Hatfield, MO 64458 | $4,181 |
79 | Jerry Findley Revocable Trust | Albany, MO 64402 | $3,888 |
80 | Herbert Findley And Lois Findley | Bethany, MO 64424 | $3,774 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”