Market Gains in Harrison County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 131
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Harrison County, Missouri totaled $2,752,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Rickey J Findley Family Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $3,774 |
82 | Michael Robert Cottrell | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $3,738 |
83 | Carroll W Livesay | Mattoon, IL 61938 | $3,664 |
84 | John N Manville | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $3,629 |
85 | Steven Michael Hamilton | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $3,579 |
86 | Ireland Jay Moulin | Trenton, MO 64683 | $3,503 |
87 | Randy W Mulnix | Bethany, MO 64424 | $3,291 |
88 | Jones Acres Inc | Gilman City, MO 64642 | $3,189 |
89 | Allen Livesay | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $3,144 |
90 | Vincent Daniel And Mary L Daniel Declaration Trust | Lees Summit, MO 64086 | $3,066 |
91 | Richard L Fordyce | Bethany, MO 64424 | $2,921 |
92 | Velma Marie Manville Revoc Inter | Trenton, MO 64683 | $2,681 |
93 | Lloyd R Manville Revoc Inter Vivo | Trenton, MO 64683 | $2,681 |
94 | Phyllis A Livesay | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $2,569 |
95 | Terry And Linda Cox Revocable Trust | Eagleville, MO 64442 | $2,478 |
96 | Kenneth Lee Crawley | Cainsville, MO 64632 | $2,379 |
97 | Michael R Brenizer | Eagleville, MO 64442 | $2,344 |
98 | Donald D Vandivert | Bethany, MO 64424 | $2,305 |
99 | Bob Price | Bethany, MO 64424 | $2,294 |
100 | Charles E Miles | Bethany, MO 64424 | $2,139 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”