Conservation Reserve Program in Harrison County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 790
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Harrison County, Missouri totaled $8,501,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Dominic Dixon | Parkville, MO 64152 | $24,265 |
102 | Glenda Esely | Boonville, MO 65233 | $24,207 |
103 | Don-lasswell Family Trust | Lees Summit, MO 64086 | $23,952 |
104 | Ella Maxine Taraba Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $23,894 |
105 | Mccoy Farms Inc | Norwalk, IA 50211 | $23,868 |
106 | Dannie Stanton | New Hampton, MO 64471 | $23,430 |
107 | Pat Stanton | New Hampton, MO 64471 | $23,430 |
108 | Raymond Richardson | Blythedale, MO 64426 | $23,411 |
109 | Pauline Preston | Bethany, MO 64424 | $23,408 |
110 | L Collins Farm Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $23,276 |
111 | Leland L Nicholls | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $23,046 |
112 | Ronald Lavern Richardson | Hatfield, MO 64458 | $22,966 |
113 | Dennis Brant | Pleasant Hill, MO 64080 | $22,909 |
114 | Joe Bob Campbell Revocable Trust | Eagleville, MO 64442 | $22,818 |
115 | Tony Mcguire | Russellville, KY 42276 | $22,553 |
116 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $22,530 |
117 | Mabel Ilene Smith | Bethany, MO 64424 | $22,464 |
118 | Patrick A And Martha A Cashen Trust | Denver, CO 80210 | $22,372 |
119 | Jim Dale Lee | Bethany, MO 64424 | $22,336 |
120 | Gilbert C Taraba Family Trust | Bethany, MO 64424 | $22,319 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”